Rain wins tenancy case

  • Excited fans get up close with One Direction wax figures

    Excited fans get up close with One Direction wax figures

    Excited fans get up close with One Direction wax figures

    Fans of the British boyband stood in line to get a chance to be in a photo shoot with the statues of the lads of One Direction -- Zayn Malik included -- at an exclusive preview at Madame Tussauds Singapore on 9 July 2015. …

  • How to pour the perfect cup of beer

    How to pour the perfect cup of beer

    How to pour the perfect cup of beer

    Pouring a perfect cup of beer that doesn’t overflow with foam is not easy if you’re not an expert. Master Brewer of Archipelago, Robert Beck, shows us how its done, with two different results — less foam, or more foam. …

  • Aide and SEA Games football squad pay tribute to Sabah quake victims

    Aide and SEA Games football squad pay tribute to Sabah quake victims

    Aide and SEA Games football squad pay tribute to Sabah quake victims

    Aide and SEA Games football squad pay tribute to Sabah quake victims at Tankong Katong Primary School. The Sabah quake tragedy hits home for Aide because he knew some of the victims personally. Footballer Sahil Suhaimi was also a former TKPS student. …

4 Jun – Even while being away from the public eyes, superstar Rain was reported to have won a case against his tenant.

As reported on Korea.com, Seoul Central District Court ruled in favour of the singer for the second time against his tenant.

The Seoul Central District Court stated, "We maintain our ruling from the first trial that the tenant should take the money deducted from his KRW 100 million (USD 84,700) deposit and leave the premises."

To recap, Rain and the designer entered into a contract back in August of 2009 and the contract was valid until March 2011. However, despite the designer using the space as a gallery, he failed to pay maintenance fees from December 2009 and then stopped paying rent altogether from September 2010.

In January 2012, Rain filed a case against the designer. However, the designer appealed the case, claiming that he was indeed the real victim as he was owed money from damages due to the leakage in the building.

Loading...

Latest News

Makanation